Skip to main content

Maverick, Uniswap, TraderJoe; Which DEX is best for LPs?

·2 mins

Maverick, Uniswap, TraderJoe: Which DEX is the best for LPs? #

A quick recap of DEXes history #

Since Uniswap V2 and its novel way to passively make market with the constant product formula, the DEX landscape greatly evolved. We discovered that the constant product was not capital efficient at all, and didn’t benefit to either LPs and traders: Most of the liquidity was idle, resulting in poor returns for LPs as well as high slippage for traders, despite high TVL.

Since UniV2, we saw some major innovation concerning the way LPs can manage their liquidity. I noticed 3 novel products that I will cover in this post.

Uniswap V3 #

Concentrated liquidity, fee tiers. Liquidity is static, and does not follow the price Fee tiers are limited

-> Liquidity managers such as Arrakis, Gamma

Trader Joe #

Liquidity shapes

Still Static liquidity

UI only allows for basic liquidity shapes

Maverick #

Limitations of Maverick #

Static positions in the pool is required to set the price. Without static positions, the AMM would be unable to rebalance the positions of dynamic modes

Key differences between Maverick and Trader Joe #

  • No need to pay gas for rebalancing
  • Liquidity shapes can be user define within the Maverick UI

DEX landscape in 2024 #

More granularity comes with more responsability #

It is all about tradeoffs #